7/1/2023 0 Comments Salomon q lab 190The floatation is phenomenal for a ski this width and this fact has been noted on some other review sites as well. My biggest takeaway with this ski is that I really don’t need the QST-118. Also as a bonus, the new graphics are very classy and subdued compared to the Qs.įirst the QST-106. But not too much! Unlike a full metal layered ski, they still totally retain their light and playful character. The addition of the carbon/flax layer and titanium power plate underfoot, really helped to address a Q Series weakness, which was lack of power and stability. It looks like these latest design tweaks adding carbon/flax and just a little metal were meant to address this issue and move them a bit more to the right.Ĭlick here for the entire Salomon 2016/17 product lineupĪfter using the QST-92, 99, and 106 for a full season, let me share some observations. If there was one knock on the Q Series, it was that on the spectrum between quickness/playfulness on the left, and power/stabilityon the right, they were a bit too far left for some expert skiers. The QST-118 will now have four lengths available The QST-106 will have a tighter turn radius at 20mĦ. (turning radius will vary between lengths)ĥ. All models have the same waist width throughout all lengths and it is the “titled” width. All models will have a Ti metal power platform underfootĤ. All models will have a beefed up carbon/flax coreģ. All models will be slightly wider with the QST-92, 99, 106, and 118Ģ. Exciting new changes for the Q Series lineupįor 2016/17 it will be renamed the QST Series and some key changes have garnered glowing early reviews.ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |